During the last decades, energy and process integration have become the most spread practices to optimize chemical processes both from economic and environmental perspectives. While the design of the integrated and conventional configurations are usually compared by referring to nominal operating conditions, assessing the implications of process integration on system flexibility could be of critical importance, especially when considering the uncertain nature of renewables. This paper aims then at the comparison of different integrated and conventional unit design performances under uncertain conditions by means of a biorefinery Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol separation case study. An indirect distillation train and different configurations of Dividing Wall Column have been designed and compared to assess the environmental and economic advantages for different flexibility ranges. The proposed methodology allows to select the most suitable configuration for the required performance and to have more conscious expectations about investment costs and emissions when flexibility is taken into account.

Flexibility and environmental assessment of process-intensified design solutions: A DWC case study

Manenti F.
2022-01-01

Abstract

During the last decades, energy and process integration have become the most spread practices to optimize chemical processes both from economic and environmental perspectives. While the design of the integrated and conventional configurations are usually compared by referring to nominal operating conditions, assessing the implications of process integration on system flexibility could be of critical importance, especially when considering the uncertain nature of renewables. This paper aims then at the comparison of different integrated and conventional unit design performances under uncertain conditions by means of a biorefinery Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol separation case study. An indirect distillation train and different configurations of Dividing Wall Column have been designed and compared to assess the environmental and economic advantages for different flexibility ranges. The proposed methodology allows to select the most suitable configuration for the required performance and to have more conscious expectations about investment costs and emissions when flexibility is taken into account.
2022
ABE
DWC
flexibility
GWP
Optimal design
Process integration
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2022 - C&ChE - Ale.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 1.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.69 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
11311-1217119_Manenti.pdf

accesso aperto

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1217119
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact