Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy.
On evidence fiascos and judgments in COVID-19 policy
Canali, Stefano
2021-01-01
Abstract
Calls for evidence-based approaches to COVID-19 have sparked up discussions on the use of evidence for policy. In this note, we expand these discussions: while the debate has mostly focused on the types of evidence to be used for policy, we argue that the assessment of judgments involved in data practices and evidence production should play a central role in evaluating policy.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
FIN HPLS publ Jukola-Canali2021_Article_OnEvidenceFiascosAndJudgmentsI.pdf
accesso aperto
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
379.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
379.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
