Three architectural projects, never realized but paradigmatic of a physical and concrete link with a new idea of reformed Milan, today appear as relevant as ever: Foro Bonaparte by Antolini (1801), the design competition projects for a great Monumento-ospizio at Moncenisio (1813), by Pistocchi and Cagnola, and the project for the City-Harbour and Lazaret at Comacchio by Bruyère (1805). In this fertile season of architectural theories and crossed by urban utopias of reform, the studies for new typologies of public facilities are key themes. New master problems for “revolutionary” architectures.
Attrezzature Neoclassiche rivoluzionarie a Milano
L. Monica
2021-01-01
Abstract
Three architectural projects, never realized but paradigmatic of a physical and concrete link with a new idea of reformed Milan, today appear as relevant as ever: Foro Bonaparte by Antolini (1801), the design competition projects for a great Monumento-ospizio at Moncenisio (1813), by Pistocchi and Cagnola, and the project for the City-Harbour and Lazaret at Comacchio by Bruyère (1805). In this fertile season of architectural theories and crossed by urban utopias of reform, the studies for new typologies of public facilities are key themes. New master problems for “revolutionary” architectures.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Luca Monica 2021 Milano Neoclassica Rivoluzionaria ANANKE 91.pdf
Accesso riservato
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
9.4 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.4 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
