Under certain circumstances, particle size measurements using a phase Doppler instrument can be erroneous due to the Gaussian beam effect, sometimes referred to as the trajectory effect. This is especially true under extenuating circumstances such as when, for cost reasons, only two detectors are being used, when the choice of detector off-axis and/or elevation angle is limited through the application, when the signal processing has only limited validation possibilities or if a particularly small measurement volume must be employed. All of these factors may be disadvantageous for measuring larger particles.In this study the physical origins of the Gaussian beam effect are examined anew. The interpretation is based on determining for each light scattering order the position of the detection volume and their separation distances from each other. Using this information and the analysis of so-called dual-burst signals, a method of estimating the maximum allowable particle size to avoid such effects is proposed. This estimation should aid users in evaluating or configuring their system for a particular application.In this method a tolerance limit is prescribed, under which the measured phase difference can vary due to unwanted scattering orders. For variations exceeding this limit, the respective particle size is considered to be too large to be reliably measured using the specified detection positions (symmetric detectors in elevation angle). These results, and also the shift of the detection volume position based On a geometrical optics analysis, have been experimentally verified. The Gaussian beam effect has been systematically demonstrated in the experiment using a stream of monodispersed droplets traversed through the measurement volume.

Measurement and prediction of the gaussian beam effect in the phase Doppler technique

Araneo, L;
2002-01-01

Abstract

Under certain circumstances, particle size measurements using a phase Doppler instrument can be erroneous due to the Gaussian beam effect, sometimes referred to as the trajectory effect. This is especially true under extenuating circumstances such as when, for cost reasons, only two detectors are being used, when the choice of detector off-axis and/or elevation angle is limited through the application, when the signal processing has only limited validation possibilities or if a particularly small measurement volume must be employed. All of these factors may be disadvantageous for measuring larger particles.In this study the physical origins of the Gaussian beam effect are examined anew. The interpretation is based on determining for each light scattering order the position of the detection volume and their separation distances from each other. Using this information and the analysis of so-called dual-burst signals, a method of estimating the maximum allowable particle size to avoid such effects is proposed. This estimation should aid users in evaluating or configuring their system for a particular application.In this method a tolerance limit is prescribed, under which the measured phase difference can vary due to unwanted scattering orders. For variations exceeding this limit, the respective particle size is considered to be too large to be reliably measured using the specified detection positions (symmetric detectors in elevation angle). These results, and also the shift of the detection volume position based On a geometrical optics analysis, have been experimentally verified. The Gaussian beam effect has been systematically demonstrated in the experiment using a stream of monodispersed droplets traversed through the measurement volume.
2002
Laser Techniques For Fluid Mechanics
978-3-540-42837-4
978-3-642-07677-0
Droplet sizing, Phase Doppler
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1152646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact