The debate on ‘evidence-based policy making’ deal with the role of evaluation, and of social sciences, in affecting the design of public programs. The reflection of many scholars is often translated in methodological terms and the preference of RCT designs is quite often the result. Indeed, we sustain a wider pluralism in the use of methods in evaluation, considering the different meanings that the term ‘evidence’ could have if we consider both the complexity of policies and the needs of the policy makers. Moreover, we suggest strategies to improve the relevance of the evaluators role in the policy making.

Ontologies, Methods and Evidences: Fostering the Use of Mixed Methods with Accuracy

Giancarlo Vecchi
2017-01-01

Abstract

The debate on ‘evidence-based policy making’ deal with the role of evaluation, and of social sciences, in affecting the design of public programs. The reflection of many scholars is often translated in methodological terms and the preference of RCT designs is quite often the result. Indeed, we sustain a wider pluralism in the use of methods in evaluation, considering the different meanings that the term ‘evidence’ could have if we consider both the complexity of policies and the needs of the policy makers. Moreover, we suggest strategies to improve the relevance of the evaluators role in the policy making.
2017
Policy Evaluation; Evidence-Based Policy Making; Ontologies in Evaluation Research
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Vecchi - RIV 2017 n. 69.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: articolo pubblicato
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 2.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1145646
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact