In the present paper, the experimental results of the use of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) as drop-in alternatives of R134a in a water-to-water heat pump are discussed. The heat pump is firstly tested with R134a, to establish the baseline performance, and, then, is tested with the two above-mentioned refrigerants considering the same compressor shaft rotational frequency and the same outlet temperatures of the secondary fluids from the evaporator and the condenser. The obtained results show that, compared to the R134a, the use of R1234yf leads to a reduction of the heating capacity and of the COP up to 9.80% and 7.39% respectively, whereas with the use of R1234ze(E) the capacity reduction achieves a maximum of 33.82% while a COP variation in the range−12.27% to +4.32% is found. A second group of tests is carried out varying the rotational frequency of the compressor shaft with the aim of matching the baseline R134a heating capacity. The results indicate an increase in the shaft rotational frequency up to 16% with R1234yf and up to 50% withR1234ze(E) which, however, leads to a maximum reduction of the heat pump COP respectively equal to 7.38% and to 18.11%
Experimental analysis of the use of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) as drop-in alternatives of R134a in a water-to-water heat pump
Colombo, Luigi Pietro Maria;Lucchini, Andrea;Molinaroli, Luca
2020-01-01
Abstract
In the present paper, the experimental results of the use of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) as drop-in alternatives of R134a in a water-to-water heat pump are discussed. The heat pump is firstly tested with R134a, to establish the baseline performance, and, then, is tested with the two above-mentioned refrigerants considering the same compressor shaft rotational frequency and the same outlet temperatures of the secondary fluids from the evaporator and the condenser. The obtained results show that, compared to the R134a, the use of R1234yf leads to a reduction of the heating capacity and of the COP up to 9.80% and 7.39% respectively, whereas with the use of R1234ze(E) the capacity reduction achieves a maximum of 33.82% while a COP variation in the range−12.27% to +4.32% is found. A second group of tests is carried out varying the rotational frequency of the compressor shaft with the aim of matching the baseline R134a heating capacity. The results indicate an increase in the shaft rotational frequency up to 16% with R1234yf and up to 50% withR1234ze(E) which, however, leads to a maximum reduction of the heat pump COP respectively equal to 7.38% and to 18.11%File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Comparison_R134a_R1234yf_R1234zeE_Manuscript_RV1_unmarked.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale in versione pre-print
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
662.77 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
662.77 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Experimental analysis of the use of R1234yf and R1234ze(E) as drop-in alternatives of R134a in a water-to-water heat pump.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
1.56 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.56 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.