In the last few decades, space debris have become one of the most important hazards for space activities; preventing their formation is the best mitigation option, and avoiding an impact can be of fundamental importance for a mission’s success. This study proposes four methods to design a continuous-thrust collision avoidance manoeuvre (CAM), which have been developed in the perspective of finding a fast and reliable approach, suitable for on-board implementation. The objective function to be minimized is the collision probability at the nominal time of closest approach. The first approach consists in the conversion from an analytical fuel-optimal impulsive manoeuvre to a finite-burn arc through an indirect optimal control model. In the second and third approach the collision probability is considered as a terminal constraint in a minimum-fuel or minimum-energy optimal control problem. These first three approaches require time consuming numerical iterations. The last method is based on the linearisation of the energy optimal problem resulting in a semi-analytical method. All these approaches are compared in terms of efficiency and robustness in a simulated scenario with Keplerian and circular orbits.
Continuous-thrust collision avoidance manoeuvres optimization
Di Lizia, Pierluigi
2020-01-01
Abstract
In the last few decades, space debris have become one of the most important hazards for space activities; preventing their formation is the best mitigation option, and avoiding an impact can be of fundamental importance for a mission’s success. This study proposes four methods to design a continuous-thrust collision avoidance manoeuvre (CAM), which have been developed in the perspective of finding a fast and reliable approach, suitable for on-board implementation. The objective function to be minimized is the collision probability at the nominal time of closest approach. The first approach consists in the conversion from an analytical fuel-optimal impulsive manoeuvre to a finite-burn arc through an indirect optimal control model. In the second and third approach the collision probability is considered as a terminal constraint in a minimum-fuel or minimum-energy optimal control problem. These first three approaches require time consuming numerical iterations. The last method is based on the linearisation of the energy optimal problem resulting in a semi-analytical method. All these approaches are compared in terms of efficiency and robustness in a simulated scenario with Keplerian and circular orbits.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
SALEG01-20.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Paper
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
668.59 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
668.59 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


