This work explores two configurations of natural gas-fired combined cycles (NGCC) with molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) for CO2 capture. Special attention is devoted to the selection of MCFC operating conditions (trade-off between CO2 capture and voltage losses), heat integration scheme, fuel use and CO2 purification. Two schemes are considered: (i) in the first “integrated” scheme, MCFC modules are installed between the gas turbine and the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to maximize the efficiency of the integrated power plant; (ii) in the second “non-integrated” layout, the MCFC is located downstream of the HRSG and a regenerative heat exchanger is designed to preheat cathode reactants up to the MCFC working temperature. This study includes a full techno-economic analysis of the two layouts based on a preliminary sizing of the key-components, and a sensitivity analysis on the CO2 utilization factor. Compared to a benchmark amine scrubbing process, the “integrated” configuration shows considerably better performance (Specific Primary Energy Consumption for CO2 Avoided - SPECCA = 0.31 MJ kgCO2^-1; Cost of CO2 avoided - CCA = 50 $ tCO2^−1), whereas the “non-integrated” solution shows higher energy penalties but similar CO2 avoidance cost (SPECCA = 2.4 MJ kgCO2^−1; CCA = 76 $ tCO2^−1).

Assessing the potential of molten carbonate fuel cell-based schemes for carbon capture in natural gas-fired combined cycle power plants

Spinelli, M.;Di Bona, D.;Gatti, M.;Martelli, E.;Viganò, F.;Consonni, S.
2020-01-01

Abstract

This work explores two configurations of natural gas-fired combined cycles (NGCC) with molten carbonate fuel cells (MCFC) for CO2 capture. Special attention is devoted to the selection of MCFC operating conditions (trade-off between CO2 capture and voltage losses), heat integration scheme, fuel use and CO2 purification. Two schemes are considered: (i) in the first “integrated” scheme, MCFC modules are installed between the gas turbine and the heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) to maximize the efficiency of the integrated power plant; (ii) in the second “non-integrated” layout, the MCFC is located downstream of the HRSG and a regenerative heat exchanger is designed to preheat cathode reactants up to the MCFC working temperature. This study includes a full techno-economic analysis of the two layouts based on a preliminary sizing of the key-components, and a sensitivity analysis on the CO2 utilization factor. Compared to a benchmark amine scrubbing process, the “integrated” configuration shows considerably better performance (Specific Primary Energy Consumption for CO2 Avoided - SPECCA = 0.31 MJ kgCO2^-1; Cost of CO2 avoided - CCA = 50 $ tCO2^−1), whereas the “non-integrated” solution shows higher energy penalties but similar CO2 avoidance cost (SPECCA = 2.4 MJ kgCO2^−1; CCA = 76 $ tCO2^−1).
2020
Post-combustion CO2 capture; Molten carbonate fuel cell; Natural gas combined cycle; Metal dusting; Cost of CO2 avoided
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
11311-1122962 Spinelli.pdf

accesso aperto

: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 2.25 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.25 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1122962
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 27
social impact