The research conducted on the applications of Topology Optimization (TO) in the architectural field is limited. This paper investigates the significance of assigning the right design and non-design domain and support conditions in the TO process and its effects on the optimization results. The existing approach of TO relies on defining the design domains in areas that are part of the structural elements. This research challenges the norm of where the structure is allocated to evaluate the results against the criteria of minimizing material. The study investigates the idea of interpreting the design domains in a more rational perspective, using anthropometric criteria to create efficient spaces with minimum material use. The methodology involves modelling a spatial structure that evaluates scenarios with different design domains, using the SIMP method. The research is part of the Material Balance Research group projects in Politecnico di Milano, where a case study is conducted on a roof canopy in an attraction park to investigate the results on a practical project. The study illustrates the impact of assigning the right design domain on the optimization process, not only on the performative and material distribution but in terms of meeting design criteria and creating usable spaces. It also reexamines the idea of optimization and highlights the concept of an optimized design not necessarily being the best design.
Topology Optimization in architectural spaces: From logical to rational design domains
Ingrid Paoletti;Samir Al Azri;
2019-01-01
Abstract
The research conducted on the applications of Topology Optimization (TO) in the architectural field is limited. This paper investigates the significance of assigning the right design and non-design domain and support conditions in the TO process and its effects on the optimization results. The existing approach of TO relies on defining the design domains in areas that are part of the structural elements. This research challenges the norm of where the structure is allocated to evaluate the results against the criteria of minimizing material. The study investigates the idea of interpreting the design domains in a more rational perspective, using anthropometric criteria to create efficient spaces with minimum material use. The methodology involves modelling a spatial structure that evaluates scenarios with different design domains, using the SIMP method. The research is part of the Material Balance Research group projects in Politecnico di Milano, where a case study is conducted on a roof canopy in an attraction park to investigate the results on a practical project. The study illustrates the impact of assigning the right design domain on the optimization process, not only on the performative and material distribution but in terms of meeting design criteria and creating usable spaces. It also reexamines the idea of optimization and highlights the concept of an optimized design not necessarily being the best design.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.