INTER-COMPARISON OF THE GLOBAL LAND COVER MAPS IN AFRICA SUPPLEMENTED BY SPATIAL ASSOCIATION OF ERRORS

Recent advances in Earth Observations supported development of high-resolution land cover (LC) maps on a large-scale. This is an important step forward, especially for developing countries, which experienced problems in the past due to absence of reliable LC information. Nevertheless, increasing number of LC products is imposing additional validation workload to confirm their quality. In this paper inter-comparison of two recent LC products (GlobeLand30 and S2 prototype LC 20m map of Africa) for country of Rwanda in Africa was done. It is a way to facilitate validation by identifying the areas with higher probability of error. Specific approach of comparison of single pixel of one map with multiple pixels of another map provided confusion matrix and sub-pixel agreement table. In this work, accuracy indexes based on the confusion matrix were computed as a measure of similarity between the two maps. Furthermore, Moran’s I index was computed for estimation of spatial association of the pixels in disagreement. Also, total disagreement, as well as disagreement of particularly confused classes was visualised to analyse their spatial distribution. The results are showing that similarity of the two maps is about 66%. Disagreements are spatially associated and the most evident in the eastern and north-western part of the area of interest. This coincides also with the distribution of the two most confused classes Wetland and Shrubland. The results delineate areas of inconsistency between the two maps, and therefore areas where careful accuracy analysis are needed.