This paper describes a simplified method to estimate the cost of CO 2 avoided for a power plant with a novel CO 2 capture system based on only a limited number of fundamental input parameters used to establish basic mass and energy flows for the plant. The cost calculation method follows a sequential approach, estimating first the cost and efficiency penalty impacts of those elements of the plant that are standard and well characterized. We then define the cost gap allowed for the novel elements to break even against a benchmark plant. This method allows one to estimate: (i) the maximum cost reduction potential that a novel CO 2 capture technology can achieve with respect to a benchmark technology, and (ii) target breakeven costs for technology developers in the form of combinations of CAPEX and OPEX for a novel capture technology needed to make the technology competitive with the benchmark system. Case studies are presented applying the proposed method to post-combustion and oxy-combustion capture systems, showing that: (i) a clear relationship exists between the breakeven costs and the efficiency penalty caused by the CO 2 capture process, mainly because of its effect on the specific capital cost ($/kW e ) of the conventional power plant components; and (ii) the minimum cost of CO 2 avoided is closely related to the capture system efficiency penalty. For the case study assumptions, avoidance costs vary from ∼20 $/t CO2 to ∼60 $/t CO2 for efficiency penalties ranging from 2.7% pts to 11% pts, respectively.

A sequential approach for the economic evaluation of new CO 2 capture technologies for power plants

Guandalini, Giulio;Romano, Matteo C.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

This paper describes a simplified method to estimate the cost of CO 2 avoided for a power plant with a novel CO 2 capture system based on only a limited number of fundamental input parameters used to establish basic mass and energy flows for the plant. The cost calculation method follows a sequential approach, estimating first the cost and efficiency penalty impacts of those elements of the plant that are standard and well characterized. We then define the cost gap allowed for the novel elements to break even against a benchmark plant. This method allows one to estimate: (i) the maximum cost reduction potential that a novel CO 2 capture technology can achieve with respect to a benchmark technology, and (ii) target breakeven costs for technology developers in the form of combinations of CAPEX and OPEX for a novel capture technology needed to make the technology competitive with the benchmark system. Case studies are presented applying the proposed method to post-combustion and oxy-combustion capture systems, showing that: (i) a clear relationship exists between the breakeven costs and the efficiency penalty caused by the CO 2 capture process, mainly because of its effect on the specific capital cost ($/kW e ) of the conventional power plant components; and (ii) the minimum cost of CO 2 avoided is closely related to the capture system efficiency penalty. For the case study assumptions, avoidance costs vary from ∼20 $/t CO2 to ∼60 $/t CO2 for efficiency penalties ranging from 2.7% pts to 11% pts, respectively.
2019
Breakeven cost; CCS; Economic analysis; Oxy-combustion; Post-combustion; Pollution; Energy (all); Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Guandalini - 2019 - CCS benchmark_final.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Final paper
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 4.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.46 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1083798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact