Hierarchical model reduction is intended to solve efficiently partial differential equations in domains with a geometrically dominant direction. In many engineering applications, these problems are often reduced to 1-dimensional differential systems. This guarantees computational efficiency yet dumps local accuracy as nonaxial dynamics are dropped. Hierarchical model reduction recovers the secondary components of the dynamics of interest with a combination of different discretization techniques, following up a natural separation of variables. The dominant direction is generally solved by the finite element method or isogeometric analysis to guarantee flexibility, while the transverse components are solved by spectral methods, to guarantee a small number of degrees of freedom. By judiciously selecting the number of transverse modes, the method has been proven to improve significantly the accuracy of purely 1-dimensional solvers, with great computational efficiency. A Cartesian framework has been used so far both in slab domains and cylindrical pipes (including arteries) mapped to Cartesian reference domains. In this paper, we investigate the alternative use of a polar coordinates system for the transverse dynamics in circular or elliptical pipes. This seems a natural choice for applications like computational hemodynamics. In spite of this, the selection of a basis function set for the transverse dynamics is troublesome. As pointed out in the literature—even for simple elliptical problems—there is no “best” basis available. In this paper, we perform an extensive investigation of hierarchical model reduction in polar coordinates to discuss different possible choices for the transverse basis, pointing out pros and cons of the polar coordinate system.
Hierarchical model reduction for incompressible fluids in pipes
Perotto, Simona;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Hierarchical model reduction is intended to solve efficiently partial differential equations in domains with a geometrically dominant direction. In many engineering applications, these problems are often reduced to 1-dimensional differential systems. This guarantees computational efficiency yet dumps local accuracy as nonaxial dynamics are dropped. Hierarchical model reduction recovers the secondary components of the dynamics of interest with a combination of different discretization techniques, following up a natural separation of variables. The dominant direction is generally solved by the finite element method or isogeometric analysis to guarantee flexibility, while the transverse components are solved by spectral methods, to guarantee a small number of degrees of freedom. By judiciously selecting the number of transverse modes, the method has been proven to improve significantly the accuracy of purely 1-dimensional solvers, with great computational efficiency. A Cartesian framework has been used so far both in slab domains and cylindrical pipes (including arteries) mapped to Cartesian reference domains. In this paper, we investigate the alternative use of a polar coordinates system for the transverse dynamics in circular or elliptical pipes. This seems a natural choice for applications like computational hemodynamics. In spite of this, the selection of a basis function set for the transverse dynamics is troublesome. As pointed out in the literature—even for simple elliptical problems—there is no “best” basis available. In this paper, we perform an extensive investigation of hierarchical model reduction in polar coordinates to discuss different possible choices for the transverse basis, pointing out pros and cons of the polar coordinate system.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
GuzzettiPerottoVeneziani_IJNME18.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
:
Publisher’s version
Dimensione
2.5 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.5 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.