Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective technology in post-stroke rehabilitation of the upper limbs. Because of the complexity of the system, traditional linear controllers are still far to drive accurate and natural movements. In this work, we apply reinforcement learning (RL) to design a nonlinear controller for an upper limb FES system combined with a passive exoskeleton. RL methods learn by interacting with the environment and, to efficiently use the collected data, we simulated large numbers of experience episodes through artificial neural network (ANN) models of the electrically stimulated arm muscles. The performance of the novel control solution was compared to a PID controller on five healthy subjects during planar reaching tasks. Both controllers correctly drove the arm at the target position, with a mean absolute error < 1°. The RL control significantly outperformed the PID in terms of setting time, position accuracy and smoothness. Future trials are needed to confirm these promising results.
Does Reinforcement Learning outperform PID in the control of FES-induced elbow flex-extension?
Di Febbo, Davide;Ambrosini, Emilia;Pirotta, Matteo;Restelli, Marcello;Pedrocchi, Alessandra L. G.;Ferrante, Simona
2018-01-01
Abstract
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is an effective technology in post-stroke rehabilitation of the upper limbs. Because of the complexity of the system, traditional linear controllers are still far to drive accurate and natural movements. In this work, we apply reinforcement learning (RL) to design a nonlinear controller for an upper limb FES system combined with a passive exoskeleton. RL methods learn by interacting with the environment and, to efficiently use the collected data, we simulated large numbers of experience episodes through artificial neural network (ANN) models of the electrically stimulated arm muscles. The performance of the novel control solution was compared to a PID controller on five healthy subjects during planar reaching tasks. Both controllers correctly drove the arm at the target position, with a mean absolute error < 1°. The RL control significantly outperformed the PID in terms of setting time, position accuracy and smoothness. Future trials are needed to confirm these promising results.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
document_diFebbo_memea.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo Principale
:
Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.