Gimarc's topological charge stabilization rule (TCS), for addressing site preference, has been extended to the realm of metal carbonyl clusters using Allen's energy indexes (Els) instead of charges. EIs have been computed within the extended Hückel (EH) approximation and, in order to assess an internal electronegativity scale for transition metals and to allow comparisons across the periodic table, a homogeneous set of EH parameters has been determined. EIs have been shown to behave similarly to charges on "clusters" with a rigid ligand stereochemistry like carboranes but, when one deals with metal carbonyl clusters and their intriguing ligand mobility, EIs are definitely superior to charges. EIs do address both "skeletal" and "ligand" site preferences according to the following rules of thumb: (i) more electronegative metal atoms occupy higher El sites of the uniform reference frame (URF) (i.e. the one with the lower local electronegativity) and (ii) (nucleophilic) ligand substitution preferentially occurs on the lowest energy index site of the URF (i.e. the one with the largest electrophilic character). Previous attempts to rationalize site preference in metal clusters were mainly concerned with the relative strengths of metal-metal and metal-ligand bonds and substantially disregarded electronegativity differences between different metal atoms. In contrast, we have shown that the latter are important whenever the actual URF allows for different EIs on different metal sites. In particular, differences in electronegativity have been shown to be important for M5L15and M5L12but not for M5L12bipyramidal metal carbonyl clusters. © 1997 American Chemical Society.
Site preference of ligand and metal substitution in trigonal-bipyramidal metal carbonyl clusters
Macchi, Piero;
1997-01-01
Abstract
Gimarc's topological charge stabilization rule (TCS), for addressing site preference, has been extended to the realm of metal carbonyl clusters using Allen's energy indexes (Els) instead of charges. EIs have been computed within the extended Hückel (EH) approximation and, in order to assess an internal electronegativity scale for transition metals and to allow comparisons across the periodic table, a homogeneous set of EH parameters has been determined. EIs have been shown to behave similarly to charges on "clusters" with a rigid ligand stereochemistry like carboranes but, when one deals with metal carbonyl clusters and their intriguing ligand mobility, EIs are definitely superior to charges. EIs do address both "skeletal" and "ligand" site preferences according to the following rules of thumb: (i) more electronegative metal atoms occupy higher El sites of the uniform reference frame (URF) (i.e. the one with the lower local electronegativity) and (ii) (nucleophilic) ligand substitution preferentially occurs on the lowest energy index site of the URF (i.e. the one with the largest electrophilic character). Previous attempts to rationalize site preference in metal clusters were mainly concerned with the relative strengths of metal-metal and metal-ligand bonds and substantially disregarded electronegativity differences between different metal atoms. In contrast, we have shown that the latter are important whenever the actual URF allows for different EIs on different metal sites. In particular, differences in electronegativity have been shown to be important for M5L15and M5L12but not for M5L12bipyramidal metal carbonyl clusters. © 1997 American Chemical Society.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.