Cities often show nighttime air temperatures higher by 3–4 ◦C than adjacent non-urban areas. This yields to cooling loads in average higher by 13% for urban than rural buildings. Here we assess the hygrothermal performance and the heating and cooling loads of a reference building representative of the Italian stock. We compare its performance calculated with hourly urban weather data (2002–2008) with the performance of the same building using a rural dataset instead. Milan’s Urban Heat Island reduces the heating loads by 12% and 16%, for the non-insulated and insulated building, respectively, while the cooling loads are increased by 41% and 39%. The urban building also shows dehumidification loads 74–78% lower than the rural building. Moreover, during the 2003 heat wave, the indoor air temperature is computed to be 1.5 ◦C–2.2 ◦C higher in a non-conditioned urban building than in the rural one. This increases the wakefulness, occupants’ vulnerability to overheating, and impacts the overall hygrothermal performance. Our findings highlight the need of a different design concept for urban with respect to non-urban buildings, even though they are, by law, in the same climate zone.

The hygrothermal performance of residential buildings at urban and rural sites: sensible and latent energy loads and indoor environmental conditions

PAOLINI, RICCARDO;ZANI, ANDREA;MESHKIN KIYA, MARYAM;POLI, TIZIANA;
2017-01-01

Abstract

Cities often show nighttime air temperatures higher by 3–4 ◦C than adjacent non-urban areas. This yields to cooling loads in average higher by 13% for urban than rural buildings. Here we assess the hygrothermal performance and the heating and cooling loads of a reference building representative of the Italian stock. We compare its performance calculated with hourly urban weather data (2002–2008) with the performance of the same building using a rural dataset instead. Milan’s Urban Heat Island reduces the heating loads by 12% and 16%, for the non-insulated and insulated building, respectively, while the cooling loads are increased by 41% and 39%. The urban building also shows dehumidification loads 74–78% lower than the rural building. Moreover, during the 2003 heat wave, the indoor air temperature is computed to be 1.5 ◦C–2.2 ◦C higher in a non-conditioned urban building than in the rural one. This increases the wakefulness, occupants’ vulnerability to overheating, and impacts the overall hygrothermal performance. Our findings highlight the need of a different design concept for urban with respect to non-urban buildings, even though they are, by law, in the same climate zone.
2017
Urban heat island, Building energy simulatio,n Heating, Cooling, Moisture
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0378778816315110-main.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: FT
: Publisher’s version
Dimensione 3.59 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.59 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
11311-1016929 Poli.pdf

accesso aperto

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 1.56 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.56 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/1016929
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 53
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact