In Europe the building sector spends 40% of energy resources and more than 50% of natural ones, as well as being the most responsible of the GHGs emissions. In order to realize a sustainable built environment a more holistic design approach to environmental issues is required, able to assess in a holistic way the impacts of the building along the whole life cycle. A comparison among four different technological construction systems (light weight framed wood, massive timber, masonry and aerated autoclaved concrete) are discussed including various thermal insulation levels for each solution. The analysis is developed in a “from cradle-tograve” scenario, considering: extraction, production, transportation and end-of-life of each building material, operational needs - heating over a 100 years lifespan - and finally maintenance considering the substitution and replacement of failed components. Only the construction phase is neglected. In addition to the environmental costs, evaluated considering the embodied energy (EE), renewable and not, construction and operational economic costs are considered in order to define the most sustainable technical and construction choices. From the results wood construction systems seem to have more benefits than traditional ones, despite still high economic costs.

How do costs and technology interact in sustainable building over an LCA perspective? A comparative analysis in Italian context

PITTAU, FRANCESCO;VILLA, NADIA;DE ANGELIS, ENRICO;DOTELLI, GIOVANNI
2012-01-01

Abstract

In Europe the building sector spends 40% of energy resources and more than 50% of natural ones, as well as being the most responsible of the GHGs emissions. In order to realize a sustainable built environment a more holistic design approach to environmental issues is required, able to assess in a holistic way the impacts of the building along the whole life cycle. A comparison among four different technological construction systems (light weight framed wood, massive timber, masonry and aerated autoclaved concrete) are discussed including various thermal insulation levels for each solution. The analysis is developed in a “from cradle-tograve” scenario, considering: extraction, production, transportation and end-of-life of each building material, operational needs - heating over a 100 years lifespan - and finally maintenance considering the substitution and replacement of failed components. Only the construction phase is neglected. In addition to the environmental costs, evaluated considering the embodied energy (EE), renewable and not, construction and operational economic costs are considered in order to define the most sustainable technical and construction choices. From the results wood construction systems seem to have more benefits than traditional ones, despite still high economic costs.
2012
BSA 2012 – Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Building Sustainability Assessment
9789899567160
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PAPER BSA 2012_Porto2 gd.PDF

Accesso riservato

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 628.7 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
628.7 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri
BSA2012_Pittau et al_Revised version.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Pre-Print (o Pre-Refereeing)
Dimensione 563.91 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
563.91 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/657749
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact