Purpose: To investigate the effects of interfraction setup uncertainties on the dose distribution within the clinical target volume (CTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) of left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing external radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Interfractional setup errors were assessed by measuring surface control points displacements during 89 irradiation sessions in 4 patients, by means of opto-electronic localization. The measured position deviations were fed back to the treatment planning system for the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric effects within CTV and OARs (lung, heart). Results: Results revealed errors above 5 mm on some of the control points, but corresponding volumetric variations were on average below 2% for both the CTV within the 95–105% dose range and the OARs receiving more than 50% and 90% of the prescribed dose. A specific sensitivity to the setup errors was found as a function of the treatment plan design, leading to isolated cases exhibiting volumetric variations of CTV and OARs exceeding 2%. Conclusions: This study confirms the potential increase of treatment quality provided by the systematic patient position verification and highlights the role of opto-electronic position detection systems for the real-time check of patient setup errors and the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric consequences, as a way to achieve consistent dose delivery.

Dosimetric effects within target and organs at risk of interfractional patient mispositioning in left breast cancer radiotherapy.

BARONI, GUIDO;GARIBALDI, CRISTINA;RIBOLDI, MARCO;PEDOTTI, ANTONIO
2004-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the effects of interfraction setup uncertainties on the dose distribution within the clinical target volume (CTV) and the organs at risk (OAR) of left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing external radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Interfractional setup errors were assessed by measuring surface control points displacements during 89 irradiation sessions in 4 patients, by means of opto-electronic localization. The measured position deviations were fed back to the treatment planning system for the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric effects within CTV and OARs (lung, heart). Results: Results revealed errors above 5 mm on some of the control points, but corresponding volumetric variations were on average below 2% for both the CTV within the 95–105% dose range and the OARs receiving more than 50% and 90% of the prescribed dose. A specific sensitivity to the setup errors was found as a function of the treatment plan design, leading to isolated cases exhibiting volumetric variations of CTV and OARs exceeding 2%. Conclusions: This study confirms the potential increase of treatment quality provided by the systematic patient position verification and highlights the role of opto-electronic position detection systems for the real-time check of patient setup errors and the evaluation of the corresponding dosimetric consequences, as a way to achieve consistent dose delivery.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Baroni et al IJROBP 2004.pdf

Accesso riservato

: Post-Print (DRAFT o Author’s Accepted Manuscript-AAM)
Dimensione 639.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
639.06 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11311/555317
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact